Looking at buying an H to fix up as my grandfather used to have one on the farm growing up. Since he has passed away I have often thought about buying an H to restore in memory of him and the time we shared as I grew up. So my questions are is there any particular problems to look out for that are common among them? Any years better than others? And also how to identify one with a M&W hand clutch? Also any tips, suggestions and the like all appreciated. Thank you all 8)
Thinking about buying an H, have questions..
- Thread starter Chris D
- Start date
I love H's. I guess because it was always our smallest tractor, hence, the smallest driver spent a lot of time on it, as a child. And then later- comfortable, sitting up high with clear view, and easy on/off.
One thing to check is the clutch. If it grabs at the bottom, it needs to be replaced, but you can replace an H clutch without splitting it.
One thing to check is the clutch. If it grabs at the bottom, it needs to be replaced, but you can replace an H clutch without splitting it.
M&W hand clutch. Big old lever on the left side. This is not as I understand it a true clutch but rather disconnects the left axle. You still need the foot clutch to change gears. It is otherwise kind of like having live power on the pto if you want to stop without stopping the PTO.. Never drove an IH with such a set up but I'v been told they are the same as on an Allis 45 which was made that way for the Allis round baler which had to stop forward motion to tie and drop the bale. Good luck on your search. Vern
Matt Kirsch
501 Club
The lever comes up out of the brake housing on the left side, and the brake housing itself will be a cast piece instead of a tin pan like the right hand side.
M&W clutches are uncommon, and parts are tough to come by. If you find a good tractor at the right price without the M&W, don't hesitate to buy it unless you plan on baling a lot of hay
M&W clutches are uncommon, and parts are tough to come by. If you find a good tractor at the right price without the M&W, don't hesitate to buy it unless you plan on baling a lot of hay
RustyFarmall
Well-known member
There really is very little differance in any of the Hs. Pretty much an H is an H, irregardless of the year it was made. The exceptions would be the 1939 and early 1940 model years. Those earlier tractors did have some very minor differences such as the seats and I think there was some differances in the belt pulley drives as well. Also, there are some differances in the internals of the transmission and rear ends which might cause some interchangeability issues with later tractors when hunting down parts. One of the differances I have encountered just recently is the bull pinion shaft and brake drums. It seems that the Hs built prior to serial number 70,287 have a different bull pinion shaft, and the brake drums used on those models will not interchange with the pinion shaft and brake drums used on the later tractors, but the brake bands themselves are fully interchangeable.
In short, to ensure you do not run into any of these issues, just look for an H with a serial number of 71,000 or higher.
In short, to ensure you do not run into any of these issues, just look for an H with a serial number of 71,000 or higher.
danovercash
501 Club
As a child I drove the M with the M-W conversion pulling a hay wagon. Worked very well for a young boy not really old enough to drive an M. The conversion was made so we could chop silage.
Boss Hog":21fhzl76 said:
A tricycle H would be more prone an operater rolling one over than would a four wheeler but this is true of any of the older row crop tractors. I don't know of it being more prone to rollover than others of that age. The H was introduced in 1939 and the Ford 3600 in 1974. The Ford also has nearly twice the power. And three times the cost. I still believe the H to be as good as any for its size and age. Vern