This site uses cookies to maintain login information on FarmallCub.Com. Click the X in the banner upper right corner to close this notice. For more information on our privacy policy, visit this link:
Privacy Policy

NEW REGISTERED MEMBERS: Be sure to check your SPAM/JUNK folders for the activation email.

So, I had a thought...

The Cub Club -- Questions and answers to all of your Cub related issues.
Forum rules
Notice: For sale and wanted posts are not allowed in this forum. Please use our free classifieds or one of our site sponsors for your tractor and parts needs.
TallCoolOne58
5+ Years
5+ Years
Posts: 225
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 1:38 pm
Zip Code: 13126
Tractors Owned: 1957 Farmall Cub "Mule"
Location: Oswego, NY

So, I had a thought...

Postby TallCoolOne58 » Tue Jun 11, 2019 8:42 am

Sometimes I sit in the shop, sipping a cold one. My eyes wander over to the Cub. I still have the snow/grader blade mounted on the front.

I have a buddy, formerly in the trades, retired, outstanding welder. I keep thinking about removing just the blade, bringing it to him for a pattern, and making me up a set of forks, pallet width. Would come in handy for all kinds of things. Not looking to lift any great weight, just a potential backsaver, few bags of whatever, small logs. I have rear wheel weights installed for rear ballast. Touch control.

Hmmm. Anyone been there done that?
Opportunity is missed by most people because it comes dressed in overalls and looks like work-Thomas Edison

SPONSOR AD

Sponsor



Sponsor
 

User avatar
Urbish
10+ Years
10+ Years
Posts: 2428
Joined: Sat Sep 07, 2013 3:45 pm
Zip Code: 48158
Tractors Owned: ~
1958 International Cub LoBoy
1947 Farmall H
1946 Farmall B
1953 Willys CJ3B
2022 Massey Ferguson GC1723E Subcompact

Cub Loboy L-54 Leveling and Grader Blade
Circle of Safety: Y
Location: Manchester, MI

Re: So, I had a thought...

Postby Urbish » Tue Jun 11, 2019 8:56 am

The lift assembly for the snow/grader blade is not particularly strong in my opinion. But if you only used it for very light tasks it may work. Keep in mind that an enormous amount of downward force will be transmitted to the lower bolster/implement mount, especially when traversing uneven terrain. I'm not sure how much it would like that.

I do not have touch-control. With the master control lever, you are applying lifting force from the rear rockshaft. Lifting the blade puts the front to rear rockshaft connection rod in compression. If lifting anything more substantial than the snow blade, it may have a tendency to buckle. Mine was buckling sometimes when lifting the blade against a snowbank when I first got my tractor as the rod was slightly bent. After straightening it, it doesn't buckle anymore.
Jim

Circle of Safety

TallCoolOne58
5+ Years
5+ Years
Posts: 225
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 1:38 pm
Zip Code: 13126
Tractors Owned: 1957 Farmall Cub "Mule"
Location: Oswego, NY

Re: So, I had a thought...

Postby TallCoolOne58 » Tue Jun 11, 2019 9:06 am

Urbish wrote:The lift assembly for the snow/grader blade is not particularly strong in my opinion. But if you only used it for very light tasks it may work. Keep in mind that an enormous amount of downward force will be transmitted to the lower bolster/implement mount, especially when traversing uneven terrain. I'm not sure how much it would like that.

I do not have touch-control. With the master control lever, you are applying lifting force from the rear rockshaft. Lifting the blade puts the front to rear rockshaft connection rod in compression. If lifting anything more substantial than the snow blade, it may have a tendency to buckle. Mine was buckling sometimes when lifting the blade against a snowbank when I first got my tractor as the rod was slightly bent. After straightening it, it doesn't buckle anymore.


Those are valid points, and food for thought. Forgot about the attachment point at the bolster, and the force on it. Basically, what you're saying, the whole blade assembly was never really designed to lift more than the weight of the snow blade. Appreciate the input.
Opportunity is missed by most people because it comes dressed in overalls and looks like work-Thomas Edison

User avatar
Urbish
10+ Years
10+ Years
Posts: 2428
Joined: Sat Sep 07, 2013 3:45 pm
Zip Code: 48158
Tractors Owned: ~
1958 International Cub LoBoy
1947 Farmall H
1946 Farmall B
1953 Willys CJ3B
2022 Massey Ferguson GC1723E Subcompact

Cub Loboy L-54 Leveling and Grader Blade
Circle of Safety: Y
Location: Manchester, MI

Re: So, I had a thought...

Postby Urbish » Tue Jun 11, 2019 9:25 am

That's just my engineering opinion without doing any math. I should figure out how much down-force gets transmitted through the bolster. I added a 3/8" rolled homogeneous armor cutting edge and 8" tall 1/2" marine grade plywood upper extension to my blade. The added weight is about the max I would want to add to the manually operated lift.

Question: Which version of the leveling and grader blade do you have? The pivot at the bolster on the early ones was simply supported on the end of a rod without any support on the outboard side. Overstressing this will bend or break the rod. I would not attempt to execute your idea if you have an early setup like this:

Image


The later 54A has a revised underslung bracket that does provide some additional support on the outboard side:

Image

EDIT: You might want to try hanging some additional weight on your blade and trying to lift it before you fabricate anything. Keep in mind that the forks will stick out further than your blade, moving the center of gravity much further forward and adding significant stress to the lift system without even having a loaded pallet on it. Anything you put on the pallet will be several feet in front of the tractor adding even higher stress to the components.
Jim

Circle of Safety

TallCoolOne58
5+ Years
5+ Years
Posts: 225
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 1:38 pm
Zip Code: 13126
Tractors Owned: 1957 Farmall Cub "Mule"
Location: Oswego, NY

Re: So, I had a thought...

Postby TallCoolOne58 » Tue Jun 11, 2019 9:34 am

Urbish wrote:That's just my engineering opinion without doing any math. I should figure out how much down-force gets transmitted through the bolster. I added a 3/8" rolled homogeneous armor cutting edge and 8" tall 1/2" marine grade plywood upper extension to my blade. The added weight is about the max I would want to add to the manually operated lift.

Question: Which version of the leveling and grader blade do you have? The pivot at the bolster on the early ones was simply supported on the end of a rod without any support on the outboard side. Overstressing this will bend or break the rod. I would not attempt to execute your idea if you have an early setup like this:

Image


The later 54A has a revised underslung bracket that does provide some additional support on the outboard side:

Image


I have the 54A. Looking at the pic, the bolster looks like the force would be at the end of a diving board, just begging to snap.

I have the snow blade with the optional steel extension, on the upper edge of the blade (of course). I can't imagine a fork set, forks of maybe angle iron, weighing as much as, or even more than the snow blade. But, add an extra 100 pounds or so of pallet, hay bales, bags of concrete, mulch, or what-have-you...

Hmm.

Edit: just read your edit. I have a 3/4" shackle (5/8" pin) attached to the hole in the top of the arm above the blade, for use with chain for dragging trees, beaches etc. I will remove the blade, and see what weight seem a reasonable limit. Great idea.
Opportunity is missed by most people because it comes dressed in overalls and looks like work-Thomas Edison

outdoors4evr
10+ Years
10+ Years
Posts: 2791
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 12:44 pm
Zip Code: 48370
Tractors Owned: 184
Location: Oxford, MI

Re: So, I had a thought...

Postby outdoors4evr » Tue Jun 11, 2019 9:47 am

Let me see if I understand you correctly.... You want a platform carrier attached to a front mounted blade?
Seems like rear mounted could also provide some very desirable traction during the winter. Not my pics.
Image
Image
Image

Not many pics left from an old thread about blade mounted pallet forks, but here's the discussion if you are interested.
http://www.farmallcub.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=65383
Last edited by outdoors4evr on Tue Jun 11, 2019 9:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
184 w/ Creeper & 3-Point
IH 3160a Mower
IH Model 15 Tiller
IH-54 Blade

User avatar
Urbish
10+ Years
10+ Years
Posts: 2428
Joined: Sat Sep 07, 2013 3:45 pm
Zip Code: 48158
Tractors Owned: ~
1958 International Cub LoBoy
1947 Farmall H
1946 Farmall B
1953 Willys CJ3B
2022 Massey Ferguson GC1723E Subcompact

Cub Loboy L-54 Leveling and Grader Blade
Circle of Safety: Y
Location: Manchester, MI

Re: So, I had a thought...

Postby Urbish » Tue Jun 11, 2019 9:50 am

TallCoolOne58 wrote:I can't imagine a fork set, forks of maybe angle iron, weighing as much as, or even more than the snow blade.


Agreed, but the apparent force given that they would be sticking out so much further out in front of the tractor may bring you closer to parity than you might think. I was envisioning reworked forklift forks. If using angle iron or C-channel, that would help a little bit.
Jim

Circle of Safety

TallCoolOne58
5+ Years
5+ Years
Posts: 225
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 1:38 pm
Zip Code: 13126
Tractors Owned: 1957 Farmall Cub "Mule"
Location: Oswego, NY

Re: So, I had a thought...

Postby TallCoolOne58 » Tue Jun 11, 2019 10:01 am

Urbish wrote:
TallCoolOne58 wrote:I can't imagine a fork set, forks of maybe angle iron, weighing as much as, or even more than the snow blade.


Agreed, but the apparent force given that they would be sticking out so much further out in front of the tractor may bring you closer to parity than you might think. I was envisioning reworked forklift forks. If using angle iron or C-channel, that would help a little bit.


Strong enough, yet reasonably lightweight. I lied. I've thought about this over more than one cold one, on more than one day.
Opportunity is missed by most people because it comes dressed in overalls and looks like work-Thomas Edison

TallCoolOne58
5+ Years
5+ Years
Posts: 225
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 1:38 pm
Zip Code: 13126
Tractors Owned: 1957 Farmall Cub "Mule"
Location: Oswego, NY

Re: So, I had a thought...

Postby TallCoolOne58 » Tue Jun 11, 2019 10:05 am

outdoors4evr wrote:Let me see if I understand you correctly.... You want a platform carrier attached to a front mounted blade?
Seems like rear mounted could also provide some very desirable traction during the winter. Not my pics.
Image
Image
Image

Not many pics left from an old thread about blade mounted pallet forks, but here's the discussion if you are interested.
http://www.farmallcub.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=65383


That's awesome. If only I had fast hitch.
Opportunity is missed by most people because it comes dressed in overalls and looks like work-Thomas Edison

User avatar
radioguy41
5+ Years
5+ Years
Posts: 1257
Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2017 10:46 am
Zip Code: 18235
Tractors Owned: -
1957 Red IH Lo-Boy
1980 Red IH Cub Cadet 782
1993 Craftsman LT4000
Circle of Safety: Y
Location: Lehighton, PA

Re: So, I had a thought...

Postby radioguy41 » Tue Jun 11, 2019 3:32 pm

Circle of Safety Image ImageImage
KB3WBB

User avatar
Rick Spivey
Cub Pro
Cub Pro
Posts: 2779
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2007 10:07 pm
Zip Code: 29518
Circle of Safety: Y
Location: SC, Cades 29518

Re: So, I had a thought...

Postby Rick Spivey » Tue Jun 11, 2019 7:29 pm

See if you can find Kodiak's platform carrier, pretty sure it was on a non fast hitch tractor.
Rick Spivey
'52 Cub ("Great Personality") 148xxx
'48 Cub with FH ("Gunny Cub") 38xxx
'57 Lambretta (a slow work in progress)
'74 Triumph TR6 (Mama's toy)

TallCoolOne58
5+ Years
5+ Years
Posts: 225
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 1:38 pm
Zip Code: 13126
Tractors Owned: 1957 Farmall Cub "Mule"
Location: Oswego, NY

Re: So, I had a thought...

Postby TallCoolOne58 » Tue Jun 11, 2019 8:57 pm

Thanks for the input/ideas guys. Actually, I have a Carry-On 4×6 utility trailer that I purchased specifically for hauling with the Cub, which came with a plate and both 1-7/8" and 2" balls, 5/8" diameter shanked, a good thing since 5/8" holes aren't standard. Sometimes, for small jobs it's overkill and a bit of a chore to hook up and use.

I went out to the shop and gave the Cub and blade assembly a good look see. Urbish is right, all the weight and force is on the end of the bolster. So much for that brainstorm.
Opportunity is missed by most people because it comes dressed in overalls and looks like work-Thomas Edison

User avatar
Rick Spivey
Cub Pro
Cub Pro
Posts: 2779
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2007 10:07 pm
Zip Code: 29518
Circle of Safety: Y
Location: SC, Cades 29518

Re: So, I had a thought...

Postby Rick Spivey » Wed Jun 12, 2019 5:59 am

Searches can turn up several references to the Kodiak Karry-All. This version has been produced several times, with a few iterations. Looks like a useful tool if you don't have a fast hitch.

http://www.farmallcub.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=11943
Rick Spivey
'52 Cub ("Great Personality") 148xxx
'48 Cub with FH ("Gunny Cub") 38xxx
'57 Lambretta (a slow work in progress)
'74 Triumph TR6 (Mama's toy)

User avatar
Winfield Dave
10+ Years
10+ Years
Posts: 3560
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 2:31 pm
Zip Code: 17953
Tractors Owned: ......Almost enough.
N3NIK
Circle of Safety: Y
Location: PA, Middleport (Schuylkill County)

Re: So, I had a thought...

Postby Winfield Dave » Wed Jun 12, 2019 8:22 am

My loader forks made from pipe. Have worked perfectly for several years now.

Fork 3.JPG
Dave
"More gold has been mined from the thoughts of men than has been taken from the earth." -- Napoleon Hill

TallCoolOne58
5+ Years
5+ Years
Posts: 225
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 1:38 pm
Zip Code: 13126
Tractors Owned: 1957 Farmall Cub "Mule"
Location: Oswego, NY

Re: So, I had a thought...

Postby TallCoolOne58 » Wed Jun 12, 2019 8:56 am

Winfield Dave wrote:My loader forks made from pipe. Have worked perfectly for several years now.

Fork 3.JPG


Well now. How much weight have you lifted without breaking anything?
Opportunity is missed by most people because it comes dressed in overalls and looks like work-Thomas Edison


Return to “Farmall Cub”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests