This site uses cookies to maintain login information on FarmallCub.Com. Click the X in the banner upper right corner to close this notice. For more information on our privacy policy, visit this link: Privacy Policy
NEW REGISTERED MEMBERS: Be sure to check your SPAM/JUNK folders for the activation email.
1959 McCormic Farmall Cub
Forum rules
Notice: For sale and wanted posts are not allowed in this forum. Please use our free classifieds or one of our site sponsors for your tractor and parts needs.
Notice: For sale and wanted posts are not allowed in this forum. Please use our free classifieds or one of our site sponsors for your tractor and parts needs.
- gjpgonzo
- 5+ Years
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2016 2:38 pm
- Zip Code: 01906
- Tractors Owned: 1958 McCormic Farmall Cub
Re: 1959 McCormic Farmall Cub
Why such small amount of weight? Doesn't sound right. I bet some of the implements were that heavy..
-
- 5+ Years
- Posts: 1139
- Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2016 1:29 pm
- Zip Code: 49343
- Tractors Owned: 48 Farmall Cub "Seen Yore Dobbin"
53 F-Cub W/Loader. - Circle of Safety: Y
- Location: Michigan
Re: 1959 McCormic Farmall Cub
gjpgonzo wrote:Why such small amount of weight? Doesn't sound right. I bet some of the implements were that heavy..
Implements mounting location distribute weight and take advantage of casting design.
Too , as mentioned ,brakes are limited and additional weight will reduce braking ability.
My cub needs the tourqe tube replaced. Some one stressed it in a manner it was not designed for.
On a level surface the brakes stop the tractors own weight in a given distance with a given holding power.
Any added weight will reduce efficiency. 500 lbs is just shy of a third the tractors dry weight. Safety means riding another day , for both the operator and the tractor.
Friction brakes on a slope , overloaded means not being able to set them to unhook load without risk of tractor rolling downhill.
No place to be if unhooking a boat.
Any fuel problem ,like low fuel sloshing to low side of tank,or stalling could make a day go bad.
- LRiddle
- 5+ Years
- Posts: 488
- Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2016 11:57 am
- Zip Code: 44278
- Tractors Owned: .
1951 Farmall Cub - Chesty
Woods 59 belly mower
54A blade
1956 Gravely L
Dozer blade
Tiller
Rotary Plow - Circle of Safety: Y
- Location: Tallmadge, OH
Re: 1959 McCormic Farmall Cub
Backing a boat down a ramp with a cub sounds pretty nasty to me. I wouldn't do it. My freshly re-lined break bands barely stop the thung in reverse, let alone with weight, downhill. Recipe for disaster.
Luke Riddle
Tallmadge, Ohio
1951 Cub - Chesty
Tallmadge, Ohio
1951 Cub - Chesty
"You can't believe everything you read on the internet." - Abraham Lincoln
- Lt.Mike
- 10+ Years
- Posts: 2499
- Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2008 2:38 am
- Zip Code: 07727
- Tractors Owned: 1 -'58 International Cub Lo-Boy
2 - '46 International A's
2 - '52 Farmall Cubs
1 - '53 Farmall Super A
1 - ‘41 Ford 9N with a ‘49 8N Engine
1 - ‘48 (5641) Allis Chalmers G - Location: Farmingdale NJ
Re: 1959 McCormic Farmall Cub
A quick check on YouTube will show a dozen 4,000lb pickups that slid down the ramp into the water. Do you think a 1,500 lb tractor will resist the weight of a boat and trailer any better or worse?
Somehow I think your gonna do it anyway so please wear a life jacket and kill the engine before it goes under so it doesn't hydrolock.
Mike
Somehow I think your gonna do it anyway so please wear a life jacket and kill the engine before it goes under so it doesn't hydrolock.
Mike
Quote by Gary Pickeral I like
"If it can cast a shadow, it can be restored"
"If it can cast a shadow, it can be restored"
-
- 10+ Years
- Posts: 2929
- Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 9:51 pm
- Zip Code: 63664
- Location: MO, Potosi
Re: 1959 McCormic Farmall Cub
Mount a winch on the Cub and chain it to the nearest tree. Put a set of dolly wheels under the tongue of the trailer. Winch the boat out or in as necessary. Still get to use the Cub with no chance of baptizing it on the end of a boat trailer.gjpgonzo wrote:For the boat: I only have to pull it out of the water into onto land. Not much of a grade. Think that will be ok?
-
- Team Cub
- Posts: 17278
- Joined: Sun Feb 02, 2003 2:59 pm
- Zip Code: 55319
- Circle of Safety: Y
- Location: MN
Re: 1959 McCormic Farmall Cub
Scrivet wrote:gjpgonzo wrote:. . . chain it to the nearest tree.
Just run the chain from the tree back to the winch mount. You don't want to pull the tractor apart.
- LRiddle
- 5+ Years
- Posts: 488
- Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2016 11:57 am
- Zip Code: 44278
- Tractors Owned: .
1951 Farmall Cub - Chesty
Woods 59 belly mower
54A blade
1956 Gravely L
Dozer blade
Tiller
Rotary Plow - Circle of Safety: Y
- Location: Tallmadge, OH
Re: 1959 McCormic Farmall Cub
Sounds like an awful lot of work just to involve a cub. I'd stick with a big truck.
Luke Riddle
Tallmadge, Ohio
1951 Cub - Chesty
Tallmadge, Ohio
1951 Cub - Chesty
"You can't believe everything you read on the internet." - Abraham Lincoln
- Lt.Mike
- 10+ Years
- Posts: 2499
- Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2008 2:38 am
- Zip Code: 07727
- Tractors Owned: 1 -'58 International Cub Lo-Boy
2 - '46 International A's
2 - '52 Farmall Cubs
1 - '53 Farmall Super A
1 - ‘41 Ford 9N with a ‘49 8N Engine
1 - ‘48 (5641) Allis Chalmers G - Location: Farmingdale NJ
Re: 1959 McCormic Farmall Cub
LRiddle wrote:Sounds like an awful lot of work just to involve a cub. I'd stick with a big truck.
This would be the obvious answer, but I'm guessing he thought it would be fun and pretty cool to do the task with the Cub. I totally agree on that "if" it could be done but all things considered it's an idea with a most certain bad outcome.
So...
Use the truck.
You'll have other safer and fun uses for the cub.
Mike
Quote by Gary Pickeral I like
"If it can cast a shadow, it can be restored"
"If it can cast a shadow, it can be restored"
- clm2112
- 5+ Years
- Posts: 115
- Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2016 11:03 am
- Zip Code: 15438
- Tractors Owned: 1955 Farmall Cub
- Location: Fayette City, Pennsylvania
Re: 1959 McCormic Farmall Cub
I'll offer an opinion... I routinely move fairly heavy boats and trailers around with the Cub, the heaviest being 3675 lbs (I weighed it at a truck stop). On level ground, gravel surface it is no problem. Just stay in first gear and crawl along so it doesn't develop a ton of momentum. On a grade, up to about 5% it can handle it. Beyond that, traction becomes the issue. If your ramp area is grass, then you probably will start slipping the ag lug tires and turn the ramp into mud.
Of course, you want to make sure the boat is positioned properly on the trailer so that it has about 100 to 200 lbs of tongue weight. Have somebody ready to chock the trailer tires if it ends up being more than the Cub can handle. As the hull comes out of the water, the load on the Cub is going to increase. By the time the trailer tires are coming out of the water, you'll have the entire load on the Cub, so that will be where the any issues with traction will get ugly. At least it will not pull you and the Cub into the water, as soon as the hull gets into the water, the load on the Cub will drop off quickly.
And as an aside, people who use trucks to launch and recover are at a disadvantage over a tractor. Which is probably why there are so many videos online where the tow vehicle gets pulled down the ramp and out with the boat. First, they have less traction on the ramp. Second, they tend to forget that their vehicle will float to a certain extent. Yeah, a Ford F-150 will float if you get the back end of it in the water. That 18 gallon fuel tank under the bed starts out as ballast on the rear axle, but becomes buoyant when it is submerged in water... oops! Fuel floats
Of course, you want to make sure the boat is positioned properly on the trailer so that it has about 100 to 200 lbs of tongue weight. Have somebody ready to chock the trailer tires if it ends up being more than the Cub can handle. As the hull comes out of the water, the load on the Cub is going to increase. By the time the trailer tires are coming out of the water, you'll have the entire load on the Cub, so that will be where the any issues with traction will get ugly. At least it will not pull you and the Cub into the water, as soon as the hull gets into the water, the load on the Cub will drop off quickly.
And as an aside, people who use trucks to launch and recover are at a disadvantage over a tractor. Which is probably why there are so many videos online where the tow vehicle gets pulled down the ramp and out with the boat. First, they have less traction on the ramp. Second, they tend to forget that their vehicle will float to a certain extent. Yeah, a Ford F-150 will float if you get the back end of it in the water. That 18 gallon fuel tank under the bed starts out as ballast on the rear axle, but becomes buoyant when it is submerged in water... oops! Fuel floats
Last edited by clm2112 on Sat Nov 26, 2016 9:30 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Don McCombs
- Team Cub Mentor
- Posts: 17488
- Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2003 6:45 am
- Zip Code: 21550
- Tractors Owned: "1950 Something" Farmall Cub
1957 Farmall Cub w/FH
1977 International Cub w/FH
1978 International Cub
1948 Farmall Super A - Circle of Safety: Y
- Location: MD, Deep Creek Lake
Re: 1959 McCormic Farmall Cub
If you have your heart set on towing the boat with the Cub, Curt has some good advice. One additional factor is that as the tongue weight increases, steering effectiveness decreases, especially going up hill. If your trailer/boat combination has the tongue weight set up for towing with a larger vehicle, it may not be easy to lower the tongue weight.
- clm2112
- 5+ Years
- Posts: 115
- Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2016 11:03 am
- Zip Code: 15438
- Tractors Owned: 1955 Farmall Cub
- Location: Fayette City, Pennsylvania
Re: 1959 McCormic Farmall Cub
Yeah, Don's point about tongue weight... most boat trailers are set up with tongue weights about 10% of the total weight of the boat and trailer. That is great for stability out on the highway and keeps the boat from porpoising while motoring down the road. But that much weight isn't needed if you are just moving it around your property, launching, and recovering.
If you can, put a scale under the tongue of the trailer, then adjust the axle and/or sampson post on the trailer to better balance the boat on the trailer. Another option is lengthening the tongue on the trailer. I have one that I modified using a Fulton folding tongue, which added a few feet to the overall length of the trailer, adding leverage. Also kept the wheels of the tow vehicle a little further away from the water line on the ramp.
Here, I dug around my PC and found a photo from years ago to help explain it... don't laugh at the 1990 Bonneville being used as a tow vehicle, it worked great in that role down in Florida (where most of the ramps were paved, and a front-wheel drive car worked far better than a rear wheel drive pickup). Regardless of what you are using, be it a Cub or a truck, the important thing is having traction and good balance on the load. Even the brakes are not a big issue... like the Cub owners manual warns: Keep it in Gear and keep the speeds low when pulling heavy loads.
If you can, put a scale under the tongue of the trailer, then adjust the axle and/or sampson post on the trailer to better balance the boat on the trailer. Another option is lengthening the tongue on the trailer. I have one that I modified using a Fulton folding tongue, which added a few feet to the overall length of the trailer, adding leverage. Also kept the wheels of the tow vehicle a little further away from the water line on the ramp.
Here, I dug around my PC and found a photo from years ago to help explain it... don't laugh at the 1990 Bonneville being used as a tow vehicle, it worked great in that role down in Florida (where most of the ramps were paved, and a front-wheel drive car worked far better than a rear wheel drive pickup). Regardless of what you are using, be it a Cub or a truck, the important thing is having traction and good balance on the load. Even the brakes are not a big issue... like the Cub owners manual warns: Keep it in Gear and keep the speeds low when pulling heavy loads.
-
- Team Cub Mentor
- Posts: 20378
- Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 9:52 pm
- Zip Code: 65051
- Circle of Safety: Y
- Location: Mo. Linn
Re: 1959 McCormic Farmall Cub
Big issue. In reverse, brakes on the Cub are slightly better then non existent.clm2112 wrote:Even the brakes are not a big issue.
Normally you back the boat and trailer down the ramp to the water.
I have an excuse. CRS.
-
- Team Cub
- Posts: 17278
- Joined: Sun Feb 02, 2003 2:59 pm
- Zip Code: 55319
- Circle of Safety: Y
- Location: MN
Re: 1959 McCormic Farmall Cub
A car or truck is going to outweigh a Cub by at least 3 to 1, besides having decent hydraulic (and power) brakes on all 4 wheels. If you back a car or truck in far enough for buoyancy to make a noticeable difference, you are already in trouble. The tow vehicle shouldn't have to go that far into the water unless you are trying to float the Queen Mary or maybe a Liberty Ship.
- Lt.Mike
- 10+ Years
- Posts: 2499
- Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2008 2:38 am
- Zip Code: 07727
- Tractors Owned: 1 -'58 International Cub Lo-Boy
2 - '46 International A's
2 - '52 Farmall Cubs
1 - '53 Farmall Super A
1 - ‘41 Ford 9N with a ‘49 8N Engine
1 - ‘48 (5641) Allis Chalmers G - Location: Farmingdale NJ
Re: 1959 McCormic Farmall Cub
I used to tow a boat that size with a car like that, it used to push me through stop streets on a wet road. That's why I bought a truck (4x4). Tows,launches and hauls out the weight of a Grady White Overnighter, 225 OB and a dual axle trailer without a hint of issue.
Oh and I never get my rear tires wet when launching or hauling.
Oh ya, I move and park that rig with the tractor and it is really helpful at that, but that's on level ground. I'd never entertain the idea on doing that on a grade.
Generally those that launch their vehicles with their boats have been pushing the limits. Been towing for just about 40 years and my risk taking decisions are behind me. Good advise has been given but we can't make you accept it.
Mike
Oh and I never get my rear tires wet when launching or hauling.
Oh ya, I move and park that rig with the tractor and it is really helpful at that, but that's on level ground. I'd never entertain the idea on doing that on a grade.
Generally those that launch their vehicles with their boats have been pushing the limits. Been towing for just about 40 years and my risk taking decisions are behind me. Good advise has been given but we can't make you accept it.
Mike
Quote by Gary Pickeral I like
"If it can cast a shadow, it can be restored"
"If it can cast a shadow, it can be restored"
- gjpgonzo
- 5+ Years
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2016 2:38 pm
- Zip Code: 01906
- Tractors Owned: 1958 McCormic Farmall Cub
Re: 1959 McCormic Farmall Cub
I accept. I'm running out the door right now. Will reply with a proper ty for all of the replys tomorrow:)
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 51 guests