This site uses cookies to maintain login information on FarmallCub.Com. Click the X in the banner upper right corner to close this notice. For more information on our privacy policy, visit this link:
Privacy Policy

NEW REGISTERED MEMBERS: Be sure to check your SPAM/JUNK folders for the activation email.

49 Cub Rod Bearing Question

The Cub Club -- Questions and answers to all of your Cub related issues.
Forum rules
Notice: For sale and wanted posts are not allowed in this forum. Please use our free classifieds or one of our site sponsors for your tractor and parts needs.
User avatar
ctltmp
5+ Years
5+ Years
Posts: 391
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2016 6:39 am
Zip Code: 26047
Tractors Owned: 1949 Farmall Cub
1947 Farmall Cub
1954 Farmall Cub
Location: New Cumberland, WV

49 Cub Rod Bearing Question

Postby ctltmp » Tue Jul 26, 2016 4:59 pm

Hi everyone. I'm trying to figure out what rod bearings to order. I mic'd the journals and got 1.490,1.490,1.489,1.490.

On the bearings is this
455SB
Fm
GN
010 US

Would all this add up to a .010 under bearing size? From what I measured it's not quite -.010 and I don't want to build it too tight.

Any knowledge is appreciated in advance. Thanks
WV Mike

SPONSOR AD

Sponsor



Sponsor
 

tst
10+ Years
10+ Years
Posts: 5206
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 2:08 pm
Zip Code: 12514
Circle of Safety: Y

Re: 49 Cub Rod Bearing Question

Postby tst » Tue Jul 26, 2016 9:40 pm

a stock rod journal is 1.499 so yours is .010 undersize, the bearing you have is .010 under size, plastic gauge the bearing when you reassemble to verify correct clearance

User avatar
ctltmp
5+ Years
5+ Years
Posts: 391
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2016 6:39 am
Zip Code: 26047
Tractors Owned: 1949 Farmall Cub
1947 Farmall Cub
1954 Farmall Cub
Location: New Cumberland, WV

Re: 49 Cub Rod Bearing Question

Postby ctltmp » Wed Jul 27, 2016 7:32 am

What is the acceptable clearance for the bearing to journal fit?
Thanks
WV Mike

Clark Thompson
10+ Years
10+ Years
Posts: 1573
Joined: Sun Feb 02, 2003 11:01 pm
Zip Code: 36310
Tractors Owned: 1975 IH cub,1948 farmall cub,1979 international 3200 skid steer and a 1974 John deere 350B dozer.
Location: Abbeville Alabama

Re: 49 Cub Rod Bearing Question

Postby Clark Thompson » Wed Jul 27, 2016 8:07 am

no more than .001.
Collector of Farmall cubs and cub cadets.Injoy helping people keep their cubs running. Years of experipnce.

User avatar
ctltmp
5+ Years
5+ Years
Posts: 391
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2016 6:39 am
Zip Code: 26047
Tractors Owned: 1949 Farmall Cub
1947 Farmall Cub
1954 Farmall Cub
Location: New Cumberland, WV

Re: 49 Cub Rod Bearing Question

Postby ctltmp » Wed Jul 27, 2016 8:08 am

:?
I talked to the previous owner. He did the last overhaul on the engine. He said the crank shaft had never been machined and the put standard bearings in it, so the plot thickens.
WV Mike

Eugene
Team Cub Mentor
Team Cub Mentor
Posts: 20369
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 9:52 pm
Zip Code: 65051
Circle of Safety: Y
Location: Mo. Linn

Re: 49 Cub Rod Bearing Question

Postby Eugene » Wed Jul 27, 2016 8:21 am

Per the service manual. Connecting rod insert to rod journal "Bearing running clearance - inch -----.002 - .003".

Your mic measurements and the number on the back of the insert indicated that the crankshaft has been turned at some time.
I have an excuse. CRS.

User avatar
Slim140
5+ Years
5+ Years
Posts: 4908
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2017 6:24 am
Zip Code: 00000
Tractors Owned: .
1970 International 140
1972 International 140
1949 John Deere A
1993 Ford 4630 W/Loader
1965 John Deere 110
1961 Cub Cadet Original
Circle of Safety: Y

Re: 49 Cub Rod Bearing Question

Postby Slim140 » Wed Jul 27, 2016 8:25 am

ctltmp wrote::?
I talked to the previous owner. He did the last overhaul on the engine. He said the crank shaft had never been machined and the put standard bearings in it, so the plot thickens.


I would say it had already been ground and he didn't know it. He just got "replacement" bearings and didn't know they were .010" undersized. Just a guess on my part.
Every home is a school, what are you teaching?

Circle of Safety

User avatar
ctltmp
5+ Years
5+ Years
Posts: 391
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2016 6:39 am
Zip Code: 26047
Tractors Owned: 1949 Farmall Cub
1947 Farmall Cub
1954 Farmall Cub
Location: New Cumberland, WV

Re: 49 Cub Rod Bearing Question

Postby ctltmp » Wed Jul 27, 2016 8:54 am

Here's a picture of one of the bearings that came out of it if this help's figure out anything.

Thanks to everyone for helping!


20160725_193442.jpg
WV Mike

User avatar
Slim140
5+ Years
5+ Years
Posts: 4908
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2017 6:24 am
Zip Code: 00000
Tractors Owned: .
1970 International 140
1972 International 140
1949 John Deere A
1993 Ford 4630 W/Loader
1965 John Deere 110
1961 Cub Cadet Original
Circle of Safety: Y

Re: 49 Cub Rod Bearing Question

Postby Slim140 » Wed Jul 27, 2016 9:05 am

ctltmp wrote:Here's a picture of one of the bearings that came out of it if this help's figure out anything.

Thanks to everyone for helping!


20160725_193442.jpg


The 010 US means it's .010" undersized, just like everyone is telling you. What else do you need help figuring?
Every home is a school, what are you teaching?

Circle of Safety

User avatar
ctltmp
5+ Years
5+ Years
Posts: 391
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2016 6:39 am
Zip Code: 26047
Tractors Owned: 1949 Farmall Cub
1947 Farmall Cub
1954 Farmall Cub
Location: New Cumberland, WV

Re: 49 Cub Rod Bearing Question

Postby ctltmp » Wed Jul 27, 2016 9:12 am

I guess no other help required just now. I appreciate the help. I guess I'm just having a hard time accepting uncle Ed tells me he used std. bearings when he had overhauled it the last time.Just can't get me head wrapped around that part of it. But it is what it is.

I'll order the .010 under bearings and plastigage the clearance when I get the parts in.

Thanks again.
WV Mike

Jim Becker
Team Cub
Team Cub
Posts: 17272
Joined: Sun Feb 02, 2003 2:59 pm
Zip Code: 55319
Circle of Safety: Y
Location: MN

Re: 49 Cub Rod Bearing Question

Postby Jim Becker » Wed Jul 27, 2016 12:05 pm

Turning the rod journals does not necessarily mean the main journals were also turned. It may have standard size mains. Have you looked at them yet?

User avatar
ctltmp
5+ Years
5+ Years
Posts: 391
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2016 6:39 am
Zip Code: 26047
Tractors Owned: 1949 Farmall Cub
1947 Farmall Cub
1954 Farmall Cub
Location: New Cumberland, WV

Re: 49 Cub Rod Bearing Question

Postby ctltmp » Wed Jul 27, 2016 1:25 pm

Yes, the mains looked good, but I have not measured the main journals. The main bearings also looked nice and to be honest it wasn't in my plan to even replace the mains. After all this and some reconsideration, maybe I should?

Back on the rod bearings, I made a call to one of the oldest tractor guys I know about the bearings. He agrees with you all on my original question that whoever claims they did what, the bearings that came out of it were .010 over. If anyone is in the Northern WV or Western PA area his name is Dale Reeseman and he's probably done hundreds of tractors, sells parts and supplies and he's well up in age. Some don't like him but he's always been fair with me.

My goal here is to get a rebuild that runs well and looks decent. I know that it won't be perfect when it's done. This Cub will probably never see a plow in the ground again (although I love to plow!). It may plow some snow here and there at most if all goes well. If it weren't my wife's grandpa's tractor I most probably wouldn't be doing any of this probably. I did my last tractor 10 or 12 years ago when I still had the farm. This old girl found me, I didn't go looking.
WV Mike

Eugene
Team Cub Mentor
Team Cub Mentor
Posts: 20369
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 9:52 pm
Zip Code: 65051
Circle of Safety: Y
Location: Mo. Linn

Re: 49 Cub Rod Bearing Question

Postby Eugene » Wed Jul 27, 2016 3:07 pm

ctltmp wrote:The main bearings also looked nice and to be honest it wasn't in my plan to even replace the mains. After all this and some reconsideration, maybe I should?
One main bearing at a time. Plastigauge, check the numbers stamped on the back of the bearing. Replace the bearing cap with the bearing. Move on to the next main bearing.

If the clearance was at the maximum recommended, I would replace the main bearings. Excessive bearing clearance will cause a reduction in oil pressure.
I have an excuse. CRS.

User avatar
ctltmp
5+ Years
5+ Years
Posts: 391
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2016 6:39 am
Zip Code: 26047
Tractors Owned: 1949 Farmall Cub
1947 Farmall Cub
1954 Farmall Cub
Location: New Cumberland, WV

Re: 49 Cub Rod Bearing Question

Postby ctltmp » Thu Jul 28, 2016 9:53 am

Thanks everyone. I'll check the mains too. I guess if I'm in this deep I might as well go all the way............
WV Mike

Scrivet
10+ Years
10+ Years
Posts: 2929
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 9:51 pm
Zip Code: 63664
Location: MO, Potosi

Re: 49 Cub Rod Bearing Question

Postby Scrivet » Sun Jul 31, 2016 9:38 am

Either uncle Ed is mistaken or someone else has been in there that uncle Ed doesn't know about. Clearly the bearings you took out aren't standard size no matter how many people you talk to. Maybe he's thinking about a different engine or maybe it's been to long ago to remember clearly. So what did you have for lunch two weeks ago thursday? How long ago was it that he did the engine work????????


Return to “Farmall Cub”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests